从“翻译诗学”到“比较诗学”与“世界诗学”——建构中国文论国际话语体系的路径与指归

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 作为中国本土诗学思想的结晶,中国古典文论拥有自己独立完整的诗学话语体系,其对外翻译与传播是建构中国文论国际话语体系的关键。鉴于当前中国古典文论基本囿于本土而国际文化场域又以西方为中心的现状,中国文论国际话语体系的建构应以中国古典文论的对外译介为切入,逐步实现其从本土诗学到“翻译诗学”,再到“比较诗学”与“世界诗学”的跨越,由此推动中国古典文论从本土走向西方、进而走向世界。而在此进程中,以中国古典文论为根基的整个中国文论可以逐渐在国际文艺理论界发出自己的声音,获得国际话语权力,赢得国际话语地位,从而为中国文论国际话语体系的建构奠定坚实的基础。

关键词: 翻译诗学, 比较诗学, 世界诗学, 话语权力, 中国文论国际话语体系

Abstract: As the cream of the indigenous Chinese poetics, the classical Chinese literary theory constitutes an independent discourse system of its own. The translation and transmission of the classical Chinese literary theory in foreign languages, which is far from being sufficient at the present time, is crucial to the construction of the international discourse system of the Chinese literary theory in the world cultural field dominated by the West. The article argues that the classical Chinese literary theory should undergo the gradual transformation from the “Translated Poetics” to “Comparative Poetics” and “World Poetics” in proper sequence in order to be transmitted from the native land of China to the Western world and the whole world ultimately, in the process of which the classical Chinese literary theory could make its voice heard in the international literary field and gain its international power of discourse, thus laying a solid foundation for the construction of the international discourse system of the Chinese literary theory in the long run.

Key words: Translated Poetics, Comparative Poetics, World Poetics, power of discourse, the international discourse system of the Chinese literary theory

王洪涛. 从“翻译诗学”到“比较诗学”与“世界诗学”——建构中国文论国际话语体系的路径与指归[J]. 中国比较文学, 2021, 0(3): 176-188.

参考文献

Abrams, M. H. The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953.
Bakhtin, M. M. The Dialogic Imagination. Trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.
蔡宗齐:《比较诗学结构:中西文论研究的三种视角》,刘青海译。北京:北京大学出版社,2012年。
[Cai, Zongqi. Configurations of Comparative Poetics: Three Perspectives on Western and Chinese Literary Criticism (bi jiao shi xue jie gou: zhong xi wen lun yan jiu de san zhong shi jiao). Trans. Liu Qinghai. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2012.]
曹顺庆:《中西比较诗学》。北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010年。
[Cao, Shunqing. Chinese and Western Comparative Poetics (zhong xi bi jiao shi xue). Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2010]
——:“文论失语症与文化病态”,《文艺争鸣》2(1996):50－58。
[---. “Literary Theory Aphasia and Cultural Pathology” (wen lun shi yu zheng yu wen hua bing tai). Arts Contend 2(1996): 50－58.]
——:“翻译的变异与世界文学的形成”,《外语与外语教学》1(2018):126－129。
[---. “The Variation of Translation and the Construction of World Literature” (fan yi de bian yi yu shi jie wen xue de xing cheng). Foreign Language and Their Teaching 1(2018):126－129.]
陈跃红:《比较诗学导论》。北京:北京大学出版社,2005年。
[Chen, Yuehong. Comparative Poetics: An Introduction (bi jiao shi xue dao lun). Beijing: Peking University Press, 2005.]
Culler, Jonathan. “Comparative Literature, at Last”. Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization. Ed. Haun Sausy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006. 237－248.
Damrosch, David. What Is World Literature? Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003.
Dawson, Raymon. Confucius: The Analects. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1993.
达维德·方丹:《诗学——文学形式通论》, 陈静译。天津:天津人民出版社,2003年。
[Fontaine, David. La poétique: Introduction à la théorie générale des formes littéraires (shi xue — wen xue xing shi tong lun). Trans. Chen Jing. Tianjin: Tianjin People's Publishing House, 2003.]
Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
Giles, Herbert Allen. A History of Chinese Literature. New York & London: D. Appleton, 1901.
郭绍虞:《中国历代文论选》(第一册)。上海:上海古籍出版社,2001年。
[Guo, Shaoyu. An Anthology of Classical Chinese Literary Theories (zhong guo li dai wen lun xuan). Vol. 1. Shanghai: Shanghai Classics Publishing House, 2001.]
Heilbron, Johan and Gisèle Sapiro. “Outline for a Sociology of Translation: Current Issues and Future Prospects”. Constructing a Sociology of Translation. Eds. Michaela Wolf and Alexandra Fukari. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007. 93－107.
黄维樑:《从〈文心雕龙〉到〈人间词话〉——中国古典文论新探》(第二版)。北京:北京大学出版社,2013年。
[Huang, Weiliang. From The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons to Poetic Remark in the Human World: New Explorations in Classical Chinese Literary Theories (cong wen xin diao long dao ren jian ci hua: zhong guo gu dian wen lun xin tan) (2^nd edition). Beijing: Peking University Press, 2013.]
Hughes, E. R. The Art of Letters. New York: Pantheon Books, 1951.
安德鲁·琼斯:“‘世界’文学经济中的中国文学”,《世界文学理论读本》,大卫·达姆罗什、刘洪涛、尹星主编。北京:北京大学出版社,2013年。215－232。
[Jones, Andrew F. “Chinese Literature in the ‘World’ Literary Economy” (shi jie wen xue jing ji zhong de zhong guo wen xue). Theories of World Literature: A Reader. Eds. David Damrosch, Liu Hongtao and Yin Xing. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2013. 215－232.]
朱利安:“间距与之间:如何在当代全球化之下思考中欧之间的文化他者性”,《思想与方法:全球化时代中西对话的可能》,方维规主编。北京:北京大学出版社,2014年。20－39。
[Jullien, Francois. “L'écart et l'entre: Ou comment penser l'altérité culturelle entrela Chine et l'Europe dans le cadre de la mondialisation contemporaine” (jian ju yu zhi jian: ru he zai dang dai quan qiu hua zhi xia si kao zhong ou zhi jian de wen hua ta zhe xing). Ideas and Methods: Possibilities of a Chinese-Western Dialogue in a Globalized Age. Ed. Fang Weigui. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2014.20－39.]
Legge, James. The Chinese Classics. Hong Kong: Lane, Crawford & Co.; London: Trubner & Co., 1871.
刘笑敢:“‘反向格义’与中国哲学研究的困境——以老子之道的诠释为例”,《南京大学学报》(哲学·人文科学·社会科学)2(2006):76－90。
[Liu, Xiaogan. “A Dilemma of Reverse Analogical Interpretation: Examples from Studies of Laozi's Dao” (fan xiang ge yi yu zhong guo zhe xue yan jiu de kun jing — yi lao zi zhi dao de quan shi wei li). Journal of Nanjing University (Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences Edition) 2(2006):76－90.]
厄尔·迈纳:《比较诗学——文学理论的跨文化札记》,王宇根、宋伟杰等译。北京:中央编译出版社,1998年。
[Miner, Earl. Comparative Poetics: An Intercultural Essay on Theories of Literature (bi jiao shi xue: wen xue li lun de kua wen hua zha ji). Trans. Wang Yugen, Song Weijie et al. Beijing: Central Compilation and Translation Press, 1998.]
潘文国:“从‘格义’到‘正名’——翻译传播中国文化的重要一环”,《华东师范大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)5(2017):141－147。
[Pan, Wenguo. “From Meaning-Matching to Name-Rectification: An Urgent Step in Outward Translation of Chinese Culture” (cong ge yi dao zheng ming: fan yi chuan bo zhong guo wen hua de zhong yao yi huan). Journal of East China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition) 5(2017):141－147.]
宋炳辉:“对话与认同之际: 比较文学的人文品格与当代使命”,《北京大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)1(2017):116－119。
[Song, Binghui. “Dialogue and Identity: The Humanistic Character and Contemporary Mission of Comparative Literature” (dui hua yu ren tong zhi ji: bi jiao wen xue de ren wen pin ge yu dang dai shi ming). Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 1(2017):116－119.]
Venuti, Lawrence. “World Literature and Translation Studies”. The Routledge Companion to World Literature. Eds. Theo D’haen, David Damrosch and Djelal Kadir. London and New York: Routledge, 2012. 180－193.
王宁:“世界诗学的构想”,《中国社会科学》4(2015):169－176。
[Wang, Ning. “On the Construction of World Poetics” (shi jie shi xue de gou xiang). Social Sciences in China 4(2015):169－176.]
——:“‘世界文学’与翻译”,《文艺研究》3(2009):23－31。
[---. “‘World Literature’ and Translation” (shi jie wen xue yu fan yi). Literature and Art Studies 3(2009):23－31.]
乐黛云:《比较文学与比较文化十讲》。上海:复旦大学出版社,2004年。
[Yue, Daiyun. Ten Lectures on Comparative Literature and Comparative Culture (bi jiao wen xue yu bi jiao wen hua shi jiang). Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 2004.]
——:《乐黛云讲比较文学》。北京:商务印书馆,2019年。
[---. Yue Daiyun's Lectures on Comparative Literature (yue dai yun jiang bi jiao wen xue). Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2019.]
张隆溪:“钱钟书谈比较文学与‘文学比较’”,《读书》10(1981):132－138。
[Zhang, Longxi. “Qian Zhongshu's Remark on Comparative Literature and Literary Comparison” (qian zhong shu tan bi jiao wen xue yu wen xue bi jiao). Du Shu 10(1981):132－138.]
---. “The Poetics of World Poetics”. The Routledge Companion to World Literature. Eds. Theo D'haen, David Damrosch and Djelal Kadir. London and New York: Routledge, 2012. 356－364.

[1]	卢婕. 21世纪以来中国比较文学研究的转向[J]. 中国比较文学, 2023, 0(2): 162-177.
[2]	张隆溪. 后理论时代的中西比较文学研究[J]. 中国比较文学, 2022, 0(1): 91-101.
[3]	李阳. 诗学“变形记”诗学“变形记”——吴兴华对里尔克诗学思想的接受与误读探微[J]. 中国比较文学, 2020, 0(3): 73-88.