中国比较文学学会会刊 1984年创刊 由中国比较文学学会和上海外国语大学联合主办 ISSN 1006-6101 CN
  • 中国人文社科核心期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库来源期刊
  • 中文社会科学引文数据库来源期刊

中国比较文学 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 237-250.

• 翻译研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

偷听叙事的伦理与社会隐喻的跨文化分析——以《尤利西斯》与《红楼梦》为例

周志高   

  • 出版日期:2026-04-20 发布日期:2026-04-28
  • 作者简介:周志高,文学博士,九江学院三级教授,江西师范大学叙事学研究院研究员。研究方向:叙事学、比较文学、英美文学。电子邮箱:1318029206@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    本文为江西省社科基金项目“叙事中偷听事件的功能与意义研究”(编号:21WX16)、国家社科基金一般项目“虚构叙事中的声音景观研究”(编号:16BWW003)的阶段性成果

A Cross-Cultural Analysis on Ethics and Social Metaphor of Eavesdropping Narrative: Taking Ulysses and A Dream of Red Mansions as Examples

Zhou Zhigao   

  • Online:2026-04-20 Published:2026-04-28

摘要: 作为西方现代主义文学的代表,《尤利西斯》通过偷听行为呈现了个体的身份危机与现代社会的异化感;而中国四大古典名著之一的《红楼梦》则在封建家族社会背景下,利用偷听揭示了家族伦理冲突、性别不平等以及阶级矛盾。通过比较《尤利西斯》和《红楼梦》中的偷听叙事在不同文化背景下的伦理与社会隐喻功能,本文分析偷听叙事如何在两种文学传统中折射出不同的道德评价与社会意义,从而突显文化背景对叙事功能的深刻影响。偷听叙事不仅是一种叙事策略,更是揭示社会结构与人物内心冲突的有效手段,对跨文化比较研究具有重要的启示意义。

关键词: 偷听叙事, 《尤利西斯》, 《红楼梦》, 伦理, 社会隐喻

Abstract: As a representative work of Western modernism, Ulysses uses eavesdropping to reflect the protagonist’s identity crisis and the alienation of modern society. In contrast, as one of The Four Great Classical Novels of China, A Dream of the Red Mansions employs eavesdropping within the context of a feudal family to expose familial ethical conflicts, gender inequality, and class tensions. Through a cross-cultural comparison of ethical implications and social metaphors of eavesdropping in Ulysses and A Dream of the Red Mansions, this paper analyzes how eavesdropping narratives in these two literary traditions reflect different moral evaluations and social implications, highlighting the profound influence of cultural contexts on narrative function. The study shows that eavesdropping narrative is not only a narrative tactic, but also an effective approach to revealing social structures and characters’ inner conflicts, offering important insights for cross-cultural comparative studies.

Key words: eavesdropping narrative, Ulysses, A Dream of Red Mansions, ethics, social metaphor