中国比较文学学会会刊 1984年创刊 由中国比较文学学会和上海外国语大学联合主办 ISSN 1006-6101 CN
  • 中国人文社科核心期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库来源期刊
  • 中文社会科学引文数据库来源期刊

中国比较文学 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 247-262.

• 严绍璗先生纪念专辑 • 上一篇    下一篇

以有限想象无限——对“小径分岔的花园”与《盗梦空间》的比较研究

李思逸   

  • 出版日期:2024-01-15 发布日期:2024-01-23
  • 作者简介:李思逸,哲学博士,香港明爱专上学院助理教授。研究方向:现代性与现代主义,批判理论,中国现当代文学等。电子邮箱:s2li@cihe.edu.hk。

To Imagine the Infinity by the Finitude A Comparative Study between “ the Garden of Forking Paths ” and Inception

Li Siyi   

  • Online:2024-01-15 Published:2024-01-23

摘要: 博尔赫斯的短篇小说“小径分岔的花园”(1941)与克里斯托弗·诺兰的电影《盗梦空间》(2010)向来被认为是营造出时空迷宫的典范作品,其中的叙事策略也备受论者关注。然而,多元、非线性的时间图景不足以表达无限,循环重复必须经由“梦中梦、戏中戏”的演绎才有意义。作为叙事艺术的文学和电影,要想以有限想象无限,并非依赖于面向外部时空的扩张、堆叠,而是要在自身内部引入自我指涉的机制。作为有限性的存在,人可以想象的无限只能是一种借助数学符号、视觉图像亦或语言叙事的悖论式表达。

关键词: 博尔赫斯, 克里斯托弗·诺兰, 戏中戏, 自指悖论, 无限

Abstract: This article makes a comparative study between Jorge Luis Borges's “The Garden of Forking Paths” (1941) and Christopher Nolan's Inception (2010) to reflect on the artistic expressions of infinity in film and literature. Although these two works have been regarded as successful models of constructing temporal spatial labyrinth in literature and in film respectively, most of the interpretations either confuse the multiple non-linear time, parallel universe with infinity, or neglect the narrative impact on circulation and repetition made by the structure of “story within a story.” To imagine or express the infinity in literature and film, we must introduce the self-referential paradox into the narrative of works instead of relying on the expansion of physical time-space or the accumulation of possible worlds. As a sort of limited beings, the infinity that we can imagine and perceive could only be paradoxical expressions with the help of symbols and representations.

Key words: Jorge Luis Borges, Nolan, story within a story, self-referential paradox, infinity