中国比较文学学会会刊 1984年创刊 由中国比较文学学会和上海外国语大学联合主办 ISSN 1006-6101 CN
  • 中国人文社科核心期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库来源期刊
  • 中文社会科学引文数据库来源期刊

中国比较文学 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 15-27.

• 学术前沿:跨文化戏剧理论的中国视角 • 上一篇    下一篇

独白、协商、争论: 当代跨文化戏曲的中外“对话”模式研究

冯伟   

  • 出版日期:2020-12-15 发布日期:2020-10-20
  • 作者简介:冯伟,山东大学外国语学院副教授。研究方向:跨文化戏剧与西方戏剧。电子邮箱:arthurfw@hotmail.com。
  • 基金资助:
    本文为国家社科基金艺术学重大项目“当代欧美戏剧理论前沿问题研究”(18ZD06)与山东大学青年学者未来计划(2018WLJH17)的阶段性成果。

  • Online:2020-12-15 Published:2020-10-20

摘要: 跨文化戏曲是当代戏曲现代性转化中的重要现象。与国内学界侧重外国文化他者的本土化研究倾向不同,本文以巴赫金对话原则为指导,突出外来文化的声音,探讨当代跨文化戏曲中自我与他者的话语关系。由于实践者能动性有所不同,这种中外话语关系体现出三种样态:注重批量生产的独白、强调创造性转化的协商、展现主体性的争论。本文将分别检视其运作机制、意图及问题,并试图在当代跨文化戏曲的多种面貌中,寻找相对理想的跨文化对话模式。

关键词: 跨文化戏曲, 对话, 巴赫金, 他者, 话语

Abstract: Intercultural xiqu, which plays an important role in the modernization of traditional Chinese theatre, has been widely discussed by Chinese scholars, mainly regarding the transformation of the foreign other by and for China. This article adopts Bakhtinian dialogism to highlight the foreign other's voice, and studies the relation between the discourse of the self and the other. Because of the disparate degree of agency among practitioners, there exists three modes of Sino-foreign dialogue: monologue characterized by mass production, negotiation for creative transformation, and polemic that exhibits subjectivity. By investigating their mechanism, intention, and problems, this article attempts to find a relatively ideal mode of intercultural dialogue among a variety of intercultural xiqu productions.

Key words: Intercultural xiqu, dialogue, Bakhtin, the other, discourse