中国比较文学学会会刊 1984年创刊 由中国比较文学学会和上海外国语大学联合主办 ISSN 1006-6101 CN
  • 中国人文社科核心期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库来源期刊
  • 中文社会科学引文数据库来源期刊

中国比较文学 ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 48-66.

• 学术前沿 比较视野中的数字人文 • 上一篇    下一篇

从概念模型到计算批评:数字时代的“世界文学”研究

赵薇   

  • 出版日期:2019-12-15 发布日期:2019-11-27
  • 作者简介:赵薇,博士,中国社会科学院文学研究所助理研究员。研究方向:比较文学、20世纪中国文学与数字人文。电子邮箱:xiye1002@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    此文为国家社会科学基金重大项目“基于大数据技术的古代文学经典文本分析”(项目号:18ZDA238)的阶段性成果。

  • Online:2019-12-15 Published:2019-11-27

摘要: 本文以弗朗科·莫莱蒂等人的探索为中心,尝试用“世界文学”问题来检视“莫莱蒂道路”的得失,发现其早期实证化探索所面临的悖论和难度,追踪它随后汇入数字人文大潮的轨迹。从世界文学最棘手的方法论问题入手,可以发现“远读”这一自法国年鉴学派的书籍史研究中舶来的观念,是如何被视为解决比较文学危机的有效手段却终究搁浅的;而其后具备了“文化分析学”面向的数字人文,则有可能将“世界文学”这一抽象而雄心勃勃、或停留在经验层面的观念,发展成为可付诸生产性实践的计算批评的对象。

关键词: 世界文学, 远读, 实证化, 数字人文, 计算批评

Abstract: Focusing on the explorations of Franco Moretti, Stanford Literary Lab and the Textual Optics Lab, this article attempts to use “world literature” to examine the “Moretti Road” and discover the paradox and difficulty faced by his early empirical exploration, along with tracing its trajectory and import into the wave of digital humanities. Starting from the most difficult methodological problems in world literature, this article shows that although the concept of “distant reading” derived from the Annales School was regarded as an effective solution to the crisis in comparative literature, it eventually proved to be too limited. Only after “cultural analytics” turned towards digital humanities has it been possible to move beyond the empirical and “economic determinism” in the abstract study of “world literature” to develop a more productive practice of computational criticism.

Key words: world literature, distant reading, empirical studies, digital humanities, computational criticism