中国比较文学学会会刊 1984年创刊 由中国比较文学学会和上海外国语大学联合主办 ISSN 1006-6101 CN
  • 中国人文社科核心期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库来源期刊
  • 中文社会科学引文数据库来源期刊

中国比较文学 ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 18-29.

• 学术前沿 西学中的中学 问题与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

问题与方法:西方学者对中国叙事的研究

乔国强   

  • 出版日期:2019-06-15 发布日期:2019-09-11
  • 作者简介:乔国强,上海外国语大学教授,教育部“长江学者”特聘教授。研究方向:英美文学、叙述学和西方文论。电子邮箱:qiaobridge@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    本文为国家社科基金重大项目“20世纪西方文论中的中国问题研究”(项目编号:16ZDA194)的阶段性成果。

  • Online:2019-06-15 Published:2019-09-11

摘要: 虽然也有西方学者依据中国叙事传统来研究中国的叙事,但多数西方学者研究中国叙事所依据的是西方的叙事理论。西方叙事理论产生的基础是西方的叙事理念和叙事作品。西方叙事理论与中国传统叙事理念和叙事作品之间存在着较大的差异。用这样的叙事理论来研究中国的叙事,虽也有些帮助,但也常常会出现“捉襟见肘”或“文不对题”。本文拟从西方学者对中国叙事的基本认知、对中国传统小说的批评及其视点以及中国传统叙事技巧与方法三个方面,来梳理和评介西方学者对中国叙事研究的现状。因事件和文献众多,本文只能对一小部分文献进行扼要地梳理和评介,借此析出西方学者研究中所关注的中国问题及所采用的相关研究方法,并能为我们自己的研究提供一定的借鉴和反思。

关键词: 中国叙事, 问题与方法, 模仿理论, 小说批评, 叙事技巧

Abstract: Some of the Western scholarsstudy Chinese narrative based on Chinese narrative tradition, yet most of them study Chinese narrative based on the Western narrative theory. The Western narrative theory relies chiefly on the Western narrative concepts and narrative works. It might be helpful for them to study Chinese narrative with the Western narrative theory; yet it might also be too difficult for them to cope with or to be relevant to the subject. The author of the present article intends to make a literature review of and comments on the Western scholars' studies of Chinese narrative through the following three aspects, namely, the basic conception of Chinese narrative, the critique of Chinese novels and the literary devices or techniques employed in Chinese narrative. However, due to the huge amounts of events and literatures, the author will select parts of them and give a critical review and therefore, to analyze the issues that Western scholars are concerned with and the methods they employ, expecting that this efforts can provide Chinese scholars with some references for further studies.

Key words: Chinese Narrative, problems and methods, mimetic theory, fiction criticism, narrative technique